Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-A II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics79.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-A II  (all builds)
Memory49.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateSep 09 '22 at 18:26
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6950X-$589
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 173
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 838
71% 609 Pts
64-Core 1,456
90% 1,456 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$200
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.3% Very good
Lighting 97.2
Reflection 112
Parallax 97.9
79% 102 fps
MRender 94.6
Gravity 97
Splatting 99
80% 96.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$139
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,757
Write 1403
Mixed 486
267% 1,215 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 50.4
177% 64 MB/s
DQ Read 798
DQ Write 501
DQ Mixed 669
493% 656 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$99
89GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 267 272 274 238 233 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 452
Write 282
Mixed 328
SusWrite 279
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 51.7
166% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 232
207% 312 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 103%
Great: 118%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 7.3 7.2 7.2 7.5 7.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 161
Write 6.7
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 7.3
34% 47.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
194% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 168%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSC.16FB BLS16G4D240FSC.16FA BLS16G4D240FSC.16FB BLS16G4D240FSC.16FA 64GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
129% Outstanding
MC Read 55.5
MC Write 53.3
MC Mixed 47.1
148% 52 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 18.8
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 116%
This bench: 129%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A II Builds (Compare 1,461 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A II - $294

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $664
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback