Packard IPOWER X1000

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.53% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

20 months ago, 20 months ago.

System	Packard IPOWER X1000 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard P5N-E SLI
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091118
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 08 '22 at 20:46
Run Duration	196 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad-$90 5,765 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	46.7% Average	Memory 72.3 1-Core 31.2 2-Core 62.6 38% 55.4 Pts	4-Core 125 8-Core 124 17% 125 Pts	64-Core 125 8% 125 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8589) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	5.53% Terrible	Lighting 6.9 Reflection 5.6 Parallax 8.4 6% 6.97 fps	MRender 4.6 Gravity 7.4 Splatting 7.2 5% 6.4 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.53% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD400JD-19MSA1 40GB 153 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: 14.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 17 24 7.1 5.8 5.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Read 44.7 Write 46.5 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 12.4 26% 34.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 33%
SanDisk Cruzer Pattern 4GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 4GB free, PID 550a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 11 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	8.75% Terrible	Read 28.9 Write 7.3 Mixed 6.8 SusWrite 10.3 15% 13.3 MB/s	4K Read 9.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 36% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.75% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.2% Very poor	MC Read 3.6 MC Write 4.6 MC Mixed 3.3 11% 3.83 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 5.2 15% 5.17 GB/s	Latency 96.3 42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical IPOWER X1000 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Packard IPOWER X1000

CPU
Core2 QuadIntel $90Bench 43%, 5,765 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $90

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Packard IPOWER X1000

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Packard IPOWER X1000

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)