MSI X99A SLI PLUS(MS-7885)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99A SLI PLUS(MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160607
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateSep 08 '22 at 16:16
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 97.2
2-Core 196
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 642
63% 514 Pts
64-Core 780
48% 780 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Lighting 67.6
Reflection 69.4
Parallax 63.4
55% 66.8 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 69.1
Splatting 64.1
54% 66.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 469
Write 456
Mixed 323
93% 416 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 85.5
4K Mixed 45
155% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 335
257% 349 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 123%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
651GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 86 87 89 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 82.1
Write 88.5
Mixed 54
SusWrite 87.2
57% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 51%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
571GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 78 78 79 79 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 73.9
Write 79.5
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 77.6
52% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 51%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
521GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 120 115 122 120 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
66% Good
Read 111
Write 71.4
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 119
65% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66%
Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
593GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 82 68 68 49 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 98.5
Write 77.5
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 66.5
58% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 96%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
785GB free
Firmware: JP4OA39C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 117 119 119 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 107
Write 95.8
Mixed 64.1
SusWrite 120
71% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 74%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
0GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 47
Write 53.9
Mixed 36.5
34% 45.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSB.16FA 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.2% Good
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 21.2
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 20
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A SLI PLUS(MS-7885) Builds (Compare 1,551 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI X99A SLI PLUS(MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $493
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback