Today's hottest deals

Apple iMac17,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple iMac17,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-B809C3757DA9BB8D
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '22 at 07:13
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 89.4
1-Core 120
2-Core 214
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 617
62% 504 Pts
64-Core 658
41% 658 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RADEON R9 M395X
Apple(106B 014D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 909 MHz, MLim: 1365 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.45.40.15
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.9% Below average
Lighting 40.9
Reflection 40.7
Parallax 51.8
33% 44.5 fps
MRender 42
Gravity 40.7
Splatting 27.8
29% 36.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA7J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 101 85 99 102 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 116
Write 145
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 94
72% 99 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x31364B544631473634485A2D314739453220 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.6% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 10.1
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.1
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac17,1 Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac17,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback