Gigabyte B450 AORUS M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics92.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte B450 AORUS M  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211013
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 05 '22 at 22:44
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 117
2-Core 221
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 634
63% 516 Pts
64-Core 848
52% 848 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.7% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 132
Parallax 117
94% 121 fps
MRender 94.9
Gravity 124
Splatting 111
91% 110 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1423 810 648 461 427 404 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,496
Write 1,750
Mixed 1,350
SusWrite 696
298% 1,323 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 63.4
212% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 940
DQ Write 558
DQ Mixed 799
582% 766 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 202%
Great: 276%
Seagate Expansion+ 1TB
86GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 19 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 28.4
Write 33.2
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 19.3
20% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.5
171% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 71%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
1TB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 83 82 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
39% Below average
Read 54
Write 58.2
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 81.7
43% 58.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39%
Great: 58%
WD ON SA40 External 240GB
63GB free, PID 0704
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.9% Above average
Read 38.7
Write 39
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 19.2
44% 33.1 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 13.6
4K Mixed 9.3
815% 10.9 MB/s
DQ Read 9.2
DQ Write 13
DQ Mixed 10.6
837% 10.9 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 58%
Apple iPod 16GB
1GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 9.1 15 8.3 10 4.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
4.59% Terrible
Read 13.7
Write 11.9
Mixed 13.9
SusWrite 9
16% 12.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.59%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$50
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 32.9
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 34.4
SC Mixed 28
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS M Builds (Compare 8,068 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS M - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $430
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback