PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 76.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | XUM B75 (all builds) |
Motherboard | XUM B75 |
Memory | 8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20210301 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 03 '22 at 07:33 |
Run Duration | 168 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 39% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
65.8%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
HX256GSSDM2-PCIE 256GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1103E0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 57 278 73 103 34 MB/s
|
76.5%
Very good
|
|||
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
558GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 367 389 381 356 382 MB/s
|
84.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Hitachi HUA722010CLA330 1TB
390GB free
Firmware: JP4OA41D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 113 117 120 115 MB/s
|
53.9%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
46.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 110x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 107x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 43x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 93x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 83x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 36x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $342 |