Lenovo 20LAA00RLM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20LAA00RLM  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20LAA00RLM
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '22 at 23:58
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 13%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 67.4
1-Core 103
2-Core 204
69% 125 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 424
52% 397 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Legend(17AA 225A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
1.85% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 7
Parallax 7.8
0% 5 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 8.9
Splatting 0.1
5% 7.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.85%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ST500LM0 21-1KJ152 500GB
431GB free (System drive), PID 0718
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 16 16 9 15 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.19% Terrible
Read 22.4
Write 22.6
Mixed 15.9
SusWrite 15.2
25% 19 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
29% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.19%
Great: 13%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
10GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 6.9 7 6.4 7.1 7.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 24.2
Write 17.9
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 7.4
19% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 2.2
159% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 04CB 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.8% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 20.5
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 21.5
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback