Asus PRIME Z270-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive146% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270-P  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '22 at 22:53
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 194
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 382
51% 381 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59% Above average
Lighting 73.6
Reflection 76.5
Parallax 69.9
60% 73.3 fps
MRender 67.1
Gravity 72.9
Splatting 69
57% 69.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 625 1002 180 65 250 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 964
Write 1060
Mixed 914
SusWrite 369
186% 827 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 63.3
206% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 505
DQ Mixed 507
366% 467 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 146%
Great: 253%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 238GB
74GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 233 114 93 105 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 478
Write 407
Mixed 191
SusWrite 143
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 77.8
4K Mixed 39
143% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 174
145% 212 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 101%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
77GB free
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 72 59 57 56 53 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 470
Write 349
Mixed 322
SusWrite 83.7
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 38.2
138% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 107
130% 227 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$28
779GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 173 172 172 173 174 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 139
Mixed 82
SusWrite 168
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 113%
ADATA HM800 6TB
4TB free, PID a92a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 162 162 161 162 162 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 158
Mixed 109
SusWrite 162
201% 151 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 10.7
4K Mixed 1.1
470% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 0.7
DQ Write 12.5
DQ Mixed 1
462% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 98%
General USB Flash Disk 16GB
15GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 7.7 7.6 7.6 7.8 7.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.99% Terrible
Read 23.4
Write 8.2
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 7.6
12% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
32% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.99%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
72.7% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 21.8
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 28.2
SC Mixed 21.7
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z270-P Builds (Compare 6,518 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-P - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $798
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback