Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210105
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 01 '22 at 19:58
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200GE w/ Radeon Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 100
2-Core 200
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 428
54% 408 Pts
64-Core 285
18% 285 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.02
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Lighting 13.6
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 19.5
11% 15.9 fps
MRender 14
Gravity 16
Splatting 12.5
12% 14.2 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS128GMTE110S 128GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1102A0L
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,349
Write 500
Mixed 579
176% 809 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 11.7
133% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 316
230% 304 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 157%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$22
161GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 66 68 66 66 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 113
Write 112
Mixed 66.4
SusWrite 66.6
66% 89.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 36.9
MC Mixed 35.5
105% 36.7 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 38.6
SC Mixed 27.6
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 101%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,746 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $401
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback