Asus P8P67 PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 PRO (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110302
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Oct 23 '17 at 16:47
Run Duration	293 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	72.2% Very good	Memory 85.4 1-Core 87.6 2-Core 177 68% 117 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 352 46% 346 Pts	64-Core 356 22% 356 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430 22,369 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 3505) 1GB CLim: 730 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	3.68% Terrible	Lighting 4.53 Reflection 5.35 Parallax 3.72 4% 4.53 fps	MRender 6.33 Gravity 4.5 Splatting 3.17 4% 4.67 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.68% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
ICY BOX 250GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 43GB free Firmware: 0 Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	46.1% Average	Read 309 Write 169 Mixed 225 52% 234 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 26.6 4K Mixed 13.4 63% 20.3 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 96.9 DQ Mixed 56.6 56% 89.7 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 81%
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109 22,358 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 109 109 23176912 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -64776696750659 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1110 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 117 (B1) Unknown 0 0 6 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 128 129 545469300864 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 23176912 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 23176912 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 23176912 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 12701 (EA) Unknown 0 0 13357 (F1) Unknown 0 0 13357 (F2) Unknown 0 0 8726	37.7% Below average	Read 186 Write 103 Mixed 130 31% 140 MB/s	4K Read 12.8 4K Write 61.9 4K Mixed 10.9 66% 28.5 MB/s	DQ Read 96.8 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 32.1 44% 80.4 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$33 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 232GB free Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 82848006 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2308 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 69 60 9530719 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7266 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1516 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 97 3 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 53 521273373 (C2) HDA temperature 29 47 34359738397 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 41 22 82848006 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -74019466367444 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2849439717 (F2) Unknown 100 253 986450625	40.6% Average	Read 79.4 Write 62.1 Mixed 68.5 53% 70 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.22 4K Mixed 0.25 66% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 68%
Maxtor 6L160M0 164GB 1,484 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 14GB free Firmware: BACE1G20 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 205 193 12897 (04) Start/Stop count 248 248 11732 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (06) Read channel margin 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 249 245 56529 (09) Power-on hours count 199 199 26846 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 205 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 243 243 3968 (C0) Power-off retract count 253 253 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 35 253 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 253 252 1979 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 199 199 0 (C8) Write error rate 253 252 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 252 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 252 0 (CB) Run out cancel 253 252 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 253 252 0 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 253 252 0 (CF) Spin high current 253 205 0 (D0) Spin buzz 253 252 0 (D1) Offline seek performance 239 239 171 (D2) Unknown 253 252 0 (D3) Unknown 253 252 0 (D4) Unknown 253 251 0	23.2% Poor	Read 41 Write 39.6 Mixed 42.6 31% 41.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.51 4K Mixed 0.3 78% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 37%
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40 13,720 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 9GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 137 134 4125 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7892 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 14121 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2282 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 673 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 7218 (C2) HDA temperature 112 99 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	39.6% Below average	Read 66.7 Write 71.3 Mixed 79 55% 72.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.55 4K Mixed 0.4 88% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 65%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 44GB free, PID 1042 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Read 38.8 Write 44.1 Mixed 35.7 51% 39.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 1.02 4K Mixed 0.12 40% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMX8GX3M4A1333C9 CMX8GX3M4A1333C9 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 16GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	36% Below average	MC Read 12.2 MC Write 11.2 MC Mixed 11.2 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 12.1 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 PRO Builds (Compare 1,045 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO - $230

CPU
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	461x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	289x
Core i7-2600Intel $186Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	101x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	113x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	72x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	58x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	47x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	41x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	33x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	42x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	29x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 47,852 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $849

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16