Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire M7720

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.86% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire M7720  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer FX58M
Memory2.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090612
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '22 at 10:14
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 69.5
2-Core 135
62% 99 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 333
36% 284 Pts
64-Core 332
20% 332 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 260-$250
Sapphire(174B 2600) 1.8GB
Ram: 1.8GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
5.86% Terrible
Lighting 8
Reflection 11
Parallax 3.9
6% 7.63 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 3.2
5% 5.97 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.86%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
INTENSO 256GB
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0414A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 230 223 227 230 230 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.5% Above average
Read 244
Write 228
Mixed 228
SusWrite 228
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 21.2
86% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 53.4
67% 119 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$60
914GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 89 87 88 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 72.6
Write 79.7
Mixed 40.6
SusWrite 86.2
51% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 68%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
823GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.7 5.9 4.4 4.5 4.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.18% Terrible
Read 5.7
Write 5.5
Mixed 6
SusWrite 4.7
8% 5.48 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 2.18%
Great: 62%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 250GB
66GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 15 18 17 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 20.2
Write 15.5
Mixed 16.4
SusWrite 16.9
23% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.4
123% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x1GB
6 of 6 slots used
6GB DIMM
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.3% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 15.7
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 10.9
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M7720 Builds (Compare 121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Acer Aspire M7720

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $174
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback