Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

20 months ago, 20 months ago.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PE_FX516PE (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX516PE
Memory	9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20211130
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 01 '22 at 03:29
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	NPL-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-11370H 12,227 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	57.3% Above average	Memory 35 1-Core 155 2-Core 272 78% 154 Pts	4-Core 438 8-Core 554 64% 496 Pts	64-Core 594 37% 594 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 81%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel Iris Xe 144,774 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 13DC) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1631 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	19.2% Very poor	Lighting 23.6 Reflection 30 Parallax 27.9 19% 27.2 fps	MRender 15.7 Gravity 35.1 Splatting 19.9 19% 23.6 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 20%
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop) 35,839 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Asus(1043 13DC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.8% Poor	Lighting 30 Reflection 30 Parallax 3.9 24% 21.3 fps	MRender 40.8 Gravity 46.5 Splatting 48.1 37% 45.1 fps
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00B00 1TB 3,489 User benchmarks, average bench 208% 890GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1061 1146 1120 1072 1144 1234 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	191% Outstanding	Read 1,235 Write 1,176 Mixed 976 SusWrite 1,130 254% 1,129 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 92.7 4K Mixed 41.9 151% 55.6 MB/s	DQ Read 793 DQ Write 366 DQ Mixed 807 538% 656 MB/s
Poor: 119% ↑ This bench: 191% Great: 289%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21 168,449 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 54GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 18 18 18 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	9.96% Terrible	Read 16.3 Write 17.7 Mixed 11.7 SusWrite 18.3 12% 16 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.2 38% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 9.96% Great: 61%
WDC WD10 EZRZ-00HTKB0 1TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 474GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 37 36 37 36 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	18.3% Very poor	Read 30.4 Write 25.1 Mixed 23.8 SusWrite 36 39% 28.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMAB2GS6AMR6N-XN 1x16GB 1,668 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 11.7 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 12.5 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 227 18% 227 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-11370HIntelBench 74%, 12,227 samples	897x
Core i5-11300HIntelBench 71%, 8,880 samples	590x

GPU
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples	865x
RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)NvidiaBench 61%, 35,839 samples	622x

SSD
SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GBNvmeBench 183%, 7,990 samples	500x
INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBNvmeBench 197%, 18,245 samples	303x
SAMSUNG MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00B00 1TBNvmeBench 208%, 3,489 samples	230x

RAM
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 19,438 samples	166x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 16GBSamsungBench 69%, 3,193 samples	138x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2B1 Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 16GBMicronBench 58%, 1,942 samples	134x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16