Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FA_X412FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FA_X412FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X412FA
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '22 at 12:32
Run Duration319 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%
CPU Throttled 91%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8145U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 0.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Memory 47.7
1-Core 15.1
2-Core 9.5
20% 24.1 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 16.6
13% 76 Pts
64-Core 17.1
1% 17.1 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 17E1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
1.89% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2
Parallax 2.1
2% 1.97 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 5.9
3% 2.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.89%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GMTE110S 256GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111B1L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 81 140 179 192 272 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 428
Write 770
Mixed 513
SusWrite 170
106% 470 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 57.7
4K Mixed 10.8
70% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 497
DQ Write 52.3
DQ Mixed 394
257% 314 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 191%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
579GB free
Firmware: SBFKK1C3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 148 199 243 246 336 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.5% Below average
Read 47
Write 89.8
Mixed 110
SusWrite 239
28% 121 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 33.8
4K Mixed 10.3
41% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 54.2
DQ Mixed 136
86% 98.3 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 102%
mSD Card 124GB
116GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 19 34 45 37 59 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.8% Poor
Read 73.2
Write 22
Mixed 40.8
SusWrite 37
52% 43.2 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1.8
90% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 22%
SDXC Card 128GB
119GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 7.4 11 15 17 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
9.08% Terrible
Read 26.3
Write 23.6
Mixed 15.5
SusWrite 14.3
26% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
56% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.08%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC 0443 RMSA3310NA86H9F-2666 8GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.7% Poor
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 7.8
28% 9.63 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 8.4
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FA_X412FA Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412FA_X412FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $58
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback