Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z77 Extreme4-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4-M  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '22 at 03:01
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 83
1-Core 111
2-Core 207
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 553
56% 454 Pts
64-Core 545
34% 545 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170
Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 462.96
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Lighting 13.9
Reflection 16
Parallax 11.1
11% 13.7 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 13.4
Splatting 14.7
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
463GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 305 325 322 324 319 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 342
Write 324
Mixed 301
SusWrite 311
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 40.1
4K Mixed 29.5
95% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 203
156% 211 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
98GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 176 181 181 181 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 116
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 176
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 112%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 4GB
4GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 5.1 5.2 5.4 5.3 5.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
4.95% Terrible
Read 18.3
Write 3.7
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 5
8% 7.93 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.95%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5471-016.A00LF 9905403-518.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.5% Below average
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.7
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4-M Builds (Compare 236 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4-M - $141

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $531
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback