Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 85.1 1-Core 99.7 2-Core 199 74% 128 Pts	4-Core 358 8-Core 492 54% 425 Pts	64-Core 494 31% 494 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
(pe64) NVIDIA Vulkan GeForce GTX 980 3 User benchmarks, average bench 11% Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5836 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	3.12% Terrible	Lighting 5.8 Reflection 69.3 Parallax 60.2 5% 45.1 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.12% Great: 22%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X400 2.5 7MM 256GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 157% 222GB free, PID 0711 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 201 202 200 201 199 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	157% Outstanding	Read 243 Write 222 Mixed 157 SusWrite 202 273% 206 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 23.9 4K Mixed 20.4 1,568% 20.3 MB/s	DQ Read 20.6 DQ Write 29.4 DQ Mixed 15.1 1,590% 21.7 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 157% Great: 157%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GU7AFR8C HMT41GU7AFR8C 100 1 %0 24GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	79.3% Very good	MC Read 32.3 MC Write 30.2 MC Mixed 28.3 86% 30.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 12.4 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 71.9 56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 79%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x
NVMe MZVPV256HDGL-00000 256GBSamsungBench 201%, 5,877 samples	10x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 4x4GBCorsairBench 52%, 780 samples	10x
BLS8G3D1609DS 2x8GBCrucialBench 43%, 2,652 samples	9x
Vengeance DDR3 2x8GBCorsairBench 44%, 2,237 samples	7x

Value: 28% - Poor

Total price: $818

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16