Asus RAMPAGE IV FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive39.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141205
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '22 at 17:09
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2-$142
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 96.7
2-Core 192
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 592
57% 470 Pts
64-Core 1,113
69% 1,113 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 166
Parallax 177
135% 170 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 165
Splatting 110
106% 132 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 121%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$49
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0801A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 61 55 58 38 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 286
Write 191
Mixed 52.8
SusWrite 60.9
32% 148 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 20.5
40% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 139
132% 203 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 118%
WD Red 5TB (2014)-$101
3.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 151 154 154 153 152 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 55.5
Write 148
Mixed 35.2
SusWrite 152
71% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
78% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 2133 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 45.8
MC Write 41.7
MC Mixed 40.1
122% 42.5 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV FORMULA Builds (Compare 580 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV FORMULA - $714

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback