Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 845E
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171113
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 25 '22 at 20:15
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 193
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 353
46% 347 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
HP(103C 845E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
4.59% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 40.1
Parallax 6.7
6% 17.9 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.2
3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.59%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Solid 1TB
856GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1128B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7.1 94 365 240 13 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 466
Write 365
Mixed 354
SusWrite 121
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 93.5
4K Mixed 24.8
121% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 0.3
60% 141 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 88%
Sandisk SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GB
101GB free
Firmware: X6103006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 146 109 96 111 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 459
Write 435
Mixed 210
SusWrite 120
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 96.6
4K Mixed 47.6
169% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 175
153% 230 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5700-027.A00G Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.9% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 23.6
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 31.4
SC Mixed 23.1
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Notebook Builds (Compare 9,089 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback