Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel NUC6i7KYB
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160503
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '22 at 17:30
Run Duration305 Seconds
Run User BLZ-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6770HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 84
2-Core 153
63% 106 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 378
36% 296 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
Intel(8086 2064) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.8141
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
12% Very poor
Lighting 15.3
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 15.4
12% 13.5 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 14.4
Splatting 13.4
11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 500GB
310GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1514 1058 291 242 207 213 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 1,486
Write 1,580
Mixed 1,500
SusWrite 588
290% 1,288 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 65.2
217% 74.9 MB/s
DQ Read 739
DQ Write 560
DQ Mixed 640
481% 646 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 192%
Great: 354%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$150
238GB free
Firmware: BXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 919 922 922 923 922 917 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 1,752
Write 927
Mixed 741
SusWrite 921
241% 1,085 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 50.3
186% 67.4 MB/s
DQ Read 825
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 402
344% 519 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 209%
Great: 243%
AI Mass Storage 32GB
30GB free, PID null, Kingston DTSES
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 9 9 8.9 8.8 8.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
6.67% Terrible
Read 26.1
Write 8.2
Mixed 3
SusWrite 8.8
12% 11.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.67%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 46.7
MC Write 53.8
MC Mixed 23.6
118% 41.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 18.5
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback