HP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI IONA
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100303
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 24 '22 at 10:49
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
48.9% Average
Memory 64.4
1-Core 81.2
2-Core 136
55% 93.9 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 197
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220
MSI(1462 1910) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
1.76% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 1.2
1% 1.8 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 3.2
3% 3.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.76%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 170 181 193 183 184 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.5% Above average
Read 236
Write 156
Mixed 201
SusWrite 180
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 43.9
4K Mixed 23.6
82% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 113
108% 169 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 125%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64
455GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 79 80 80 79 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 75.8
Write 78.2
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 78.3
54% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 57%
WD My Passport Essential USB 3.0 1TB
852GB free, PID 0730
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 87 89 90 87 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 86
Write 88.6
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 87.1
102% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 36%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
863GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 67 64 65 61 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 63.6
Write 86.8
Mixed 45.5
SusWrite 63.5
89% 64.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 53%
Ext Hard Disk 200GB
110GB free, PID 0377
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 25 25 24 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.1% Very poor
Read 27.1
Write 24.2
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 24.5
32% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
59% 0.7 MB/s
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
34GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 8.6 12 12 11 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
8.53% Terrible
Read 33
Write 26.6
Mixed 13.9
SusWrite 10.7
26% 21 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 2 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.53%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HP497157-C01-ELDW 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.9% Poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 10
23% 8.17 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 1.6
6% 2 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $98
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $256Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $48G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback