Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$112 52,721 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 74.7 1-Core 109 2-Core 213 74% 132 Pts	4-Core 383 8-Core 631 62% 507 Pts	64-Core 827 51% 827 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 8621) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Lighting 17.1 Reflection 23.4 Parallax 18.8 14% 19.8 fps	MRender 16.2 Gravity 19.3 Splatting 17.1 14% 17.5 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR022 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 506 Write 227 Mixed 276 74% 336 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 82.2 4K Mixed 22.7 113% 43.8 MB/s	DQ Read 153 DQ Write 7.5 DQ Mixed 0.5 20% 53.8 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 92%
ASolid USB 32GB 292 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 27GB free, PID 205a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 19 18 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	10% Very poor	Read 22.5 Write 12.7 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 17.8 24% 18.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.1 72% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 1x8GB 3,476 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.9% Below average	MC Read 14.1 MC Write 10.8 MC Mixed 12.7 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 13.5 SC Mixed 12.6 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 91 44% 91 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x16GBUnknownBench 43%, 3,974 samples	126x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	97x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	85x

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $305

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16