Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C51
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201208
Uptime7 Days
Run DateAug 23 '22 at 21:11
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$115
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 74.7
1-Core 109
2-Core 213
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 631
62% 507 Pts
64-Core 827
51% 827 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 8621) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 17.1
Reflection 23.4
Parallax 18.8
14% 19.8 fps
MRender 16.2
Gravity 19.3
Splatting 17.1
14% 17.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$23
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 506
Write 227
Mixed 276
74% 336 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 82.2
4K Mixed 22.7
113% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 7.5
DQ Mixed 0.5
20% 53.8 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 92%
ASolid USB 32GB
27GB free, PID 205a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 19 18 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
10% Very poor
Read 22.5
Write 12.7
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 17.8
24% 18.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.1
72% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.9% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 12.7
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 12.6
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 91
44% 91 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 4,043 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $270
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback