Today's hottest deals

Asrock IMB-195

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock IMB-195  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171101
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 21 '22 at 21:59
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$83
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 73.8
1-Core 102
2-Core 201
70% 126 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 365
44% 338 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
ASRock(1849 5912) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
4.51% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 6.9
6% 5.7 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 0.3
3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.51%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
389GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 337 418 311 395 328 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 414
Write 399
Mixed 228
SusWrite 347
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 45.5
138% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 158
167% 277 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 111%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 38 36 38 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 107
Write 37.5
Mixed 43.2
SusWrite 36.2
41% 56 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 69%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$100
3TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 33 35 33 35 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 157
Write 34.4
Mixed 41
SusWrite 33.6
49% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 100%
WD WD10 0EMAZ-00WJTA0 10TB
511GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 85 94 85 97 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 91.5
Write 100
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 88.9
68% 91 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 1.1
309% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 106%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 40 42 41 42 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 188
Write 42
Mixed 62.7
SusWrite 40.7
61% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 105%
WD WD100EZAZ-11TDBA0 10TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 65 83 66 65 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 88.7
Write 154
Mixed 73.4
SusWrite 66.6
71% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1
296% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 115%
WD WD10 0EMAZ-00WJTA0 10TB
5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 99 90 106 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 203
Write 206
Mixed 128
SusWrite 94.9
117% 158 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 1.2
384% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 106%
WD WD80EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 39 41 39 40 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 122
Write 40.3
Mixed 50
SusWrite 38.9
46% 62.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS8213.C8FBD1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
26.7% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 7.4
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 7.6
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical IMB-195 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock IMB-195

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $210
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback