Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4005 1,572 User benchmarks, average bench 28% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	33.4% Below average	Memory 46.8 1-Core 60.1 2-Core 117 42% 74.6 Pts	4-Core 117 8-Core 116 16% 117 Pts	64-Core 115 7% 115 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 34%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 875E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.81% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 1.3 Parallax 2.4 2% 1.9 fps	MRender 2.4 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 3.2 2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.81% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116 55,768 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 237GB free Firmware: MU01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 348 Write 267 Mixed 274 66% 296 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 62.5 4K Mixed 18 80% 32.2 MB/s	DQ Read 170 DQ Write 162 DQ Mixed 176 129% 169 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GB 40,829 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.7 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 6 19% 6.5 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 4 12% 4.03 GB/s	Latency 173 23% 173 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 38%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4100IntelBench 33%, 6,492 samples	17x
Celeron N4000IntelBench 24%, 14,024 samples	14x
Celeron J4005IntelBench 28%, 1,572 samples	13x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	63x
UHD Graphics 605IntelBench 2%, 14,651 samples	1x

SSD
USNS8180S3512GJ 512GBKingstonBench 75%, 137 samples	5x
SA400M8240G 240GBKingstonBench 70%, 27,523 samples	5x
Extreme Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)SanDiskBench 244%, 4,979 samples	4x

RAM
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 39%, 1,390 samples	4x
GSLF62F-D8-------- 1x4GBUnknownBench 16%, 6 samples	4x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16