Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 10S10001US

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics38.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive324% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 10S10001US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3135
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220607
Uptime1 Days
Run DateAug 20 '22 at 16:20
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900-$1,989
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 92.4
1-Core 147
2-Core 293
97% 177 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 244
24% 197 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia T1000 8GB
Nvidia(10DE 1612) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.4% Below average
Lighting 46.6
Reflection 71.7
Parallax 45.7
38% 54.7 fps
MRender 54.1
Gravity 43.1
Splatting 47.6
39% 48.3 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
798GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1557 1509 1595 1924 1916 1910 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
324% Outstanding
Read 2,517
Write 2,334
Mixed 1,901
SusWrite 1,735
477% 2,122 MB/s
4K Read 73.4
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 93.2
306% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 582
DQ Write 398
DQ Mixed 510
375% 497 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 324%
Great: 477%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 2TB
445GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 379 376 380 379 379 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
70% Good
Read 312
Write 263
Mixed 263
SusWrite 379
69% 304 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 26.6
85% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 177
133% 177 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70%
Great: 79%
WD Green SN350 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 33006000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1602 1483 1555 1546 1522 1485 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
273% Outstanding
Read 1,816
Write 1,414
Mixed 1,045
SusWrite 1,532
326% 1452 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 75.2
252% 91.6 MB/s
DQ Read 868
DQ Write 381
DQ Mixed 471
390% 573 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 273%
Great: 390%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD8266.M16FRS 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.3% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 27.6
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10S10001US Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Lenovo 10S10001US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $2,079
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback