Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

To Intel X79

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	To Intel X79 (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190717
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 18 '22 at 19:09
Run Duration	177 Seconds
Run User	PRI-User
Background CPU	25%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 5,123 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	60.2% Good	Memory 75.2 1-Core 68.6 2-Core 130 55% 91.4 Pts	4-Core 250 8-Core 322 37% 286 Pts	64-Core 518 32% 518 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% XFX(1682 C580) CLim: 1386 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.1 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51% Above average	Lighting 63.5 Reflection 64.7 Parallax 87.4 52% 71.9 fps	MRender 65.6 Gravity 73.5 Splatting 48 50% 62.4 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
NE-512 512GB 5,933 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0620A SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 253 152 195 83 747 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 1,059 Write 27.5 Mixed 751 SusWrite 273 116% 528 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 60 4K Mixed 22.8 107% 37.8 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 114 125% 216 MB/s
Poor: 103% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 264%
Hitachi HUA722010CLA330 1TB-$45 10,195 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 572GB free Firmware: JP4OA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 86 119 129 128 129 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	68.9% Good	Read 127 Write 82.6 Mixed 59 SusWrite 114 70% 95.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 76%
SanDisk U3 Cruzer Micro 4GB 1,235 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID 5406 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 7.2 7.8 7.7 7.6 7.6 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	5.64% Terrible	Read 19 Write 7.5 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 7.5 12% 10.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 20% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.64% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5170GB0- 4x4GB 2,611 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	92.7% Outstanding	MC Read 41.2 MC Write 31.1 MC Mixed 40.1 107% 37.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 9.5 SC Mixed 9.7 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 89.9 44% 89.9 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Intel X79 Builds (Compare 2,049 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: To Intel X79

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	518x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	228x
Xeon E5-2620 0Intel $77Bench 58%, 3,540 samples	98x

GPU
RX 580AMD $131Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	151x
RX 570AMD $170Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	115x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $219Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	97x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	105x
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	48x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	44x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	202x
M393B5170GB0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,540 samples	194x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	88x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $156

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370