Today's hottest deals

Asus P8P67 EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67 EVO  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 17 '22 at 09:20
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 90.7
2-Core 178
72% 120 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 333
46% 341 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.2% Below average
Lighting 42.9
Reflection 44.9
Parallax 40.3
35% 42.7 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 37.1
Splatting 34.7
30% 36.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 229 229 196 138 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 325
Write 234
Mixed 225
SusWrite 179
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 32.7
106% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 150
114% 153 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 134%
WDC WD50 00AAKX-22ERMA0 500GB
72GB free, PID 1019
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 27 27 26 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 30.9
Write 23.9
Mixed 24.4
SusWrite 25.8
35% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
58.2% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 18.6
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 18.1
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 EVO Builds (Compare 614 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 EVO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback