Today's hottest deals

Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive74.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140408
Uptime7.7 Days
Run DateAug 17 '22 at 08:01
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$95
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 68.1
2-Core 129
57% 92.4 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 367
36% 293 Pts
64-Core 359
22% 359 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC600512G 512GB
322GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S4500104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 282 289 264 261 264 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 344
Write 241
Mixed 288
SusWrite 262
64% 284 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 35.5
112% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 215
158% 208 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 130%
Seagate ST31000520AS 1TB-$250
143GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 59 63 64 64 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 81.4
Write 80.6
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 61.6
50% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$24
412GB free
Firmware: 12.01C01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 79 80 81 82 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
46% Average
Read 82.2
Write 79.9
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 77.7
54% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.3% Below average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 10.3
28% 9.67 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,720 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $585
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback