Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-F  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200710
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 12 '22 at 19:57
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 67.7
1-Core 98
2-Core 185
66% 117 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 559
52% 433 Pts
64-Core 700
43% 700 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 3799) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Lighting 13.6
Reflection 9.6
Parallax 13.9
11% 12.4 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 16
Splatting 14.8
10% 12 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 420
Write 244
Mixed 152
60% 272 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 22.7
4K Mixed 17.4
35% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 60.6
DQ Write 33.4
DQ Mixed 7.7
16% 33.9 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 94%
Sandisk S3 500G 500GB
63GB free
Firmware: 415000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 206 210 208 208 212 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 423
Write 288
Mixed 259
SusWrite 217
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 43.5
4K Mixed 33.1
98% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 266
206% 286 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
32.2% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 10.8
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 8.3
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-F Builds (Compare 558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback