Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus H81M-C  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150602
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateAug 10 '22 at 10:06
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 189
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 355
48% 356 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 76%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6790
PwrHis(1787 2310) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.982.0.0
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Lighting 14.4
Reflection 14.9
Parallax 12.9
12% 14.1 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 10.7
Splatting 10.5
9% 11.1 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 26 21 29 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 52.6
Write 52
Mixed 38.1
SusWrite 24.5
31% 41.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 42%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
44GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 109 108 112 112 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 118
Write 119
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 109
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 68%
WD Elements 1TB
176GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 41 39 40 41 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 40.8
Write 40.1
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 39.2
50% 37 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 43%
WD Elements 1TB
101GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 55 58 59 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
26% Poor
Read 59.5
Write 55.4
Mixed 35.9
SusWrite 56.6
69% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26%
Great: 43%
External USB3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0561
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 42 41 55 53 49 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 213
Write 222
Mixed 103
SusWrite 47.9
185% 146 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 1.2
340% 6.03 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 67%
External USB3.0 2TB
2TB free, PID 0561
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 224 218 228 227 217 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 217
Write 219
Mixed 104
SusWrite 221
254% 190 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 1.2
404% 12.6 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 110%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1600 C11 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
33.3% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 9.5
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 8.8
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,042 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback