Gigabyte GA-G41M-ES2L

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G41M-ES2L  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100621
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '22 at 09:01
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9450-$110
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Memory 74.4
1-Core 39.7
2-Core 85
44% 66.4 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 168
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8570
Device(1642 3C79) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.5.3
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
6.26% Terrible
Lighting 8
Reflection 9.4
Parallax 10.7
6% 9.37 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 7.7
Splatting 6.1
6% 7.17 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.26%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 256GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 144 162 168 167 174 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.2% Average
Read 208
Write 125
Mixed 141
SusWrite 155
35% 157 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 35.2
4K Mixed 21.5
80% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 25.5
DQ Write 54.5
DQ Mixed 30.7
26% 36.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 166%
USB DISK 3.1 64GB
10GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 0.4 13 2.3 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
5.28% Terrible
Read 22.2
Write 8
Mixed 0.2
SusWrite 7.6
10% 9.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.28%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
21.3% Poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.77 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 5.6
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-G41M-ES2L Builds (Compare 230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G41M-ES2L

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $129
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback