Asrock A320M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics85.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220422
Uptime6 Days
Run DateAug 08 '22 at 19:40
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 72.2
1-Core 99.3
2-Core 198
69% 123 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 438
58% 433 Pts
64-Core 429
27% 429 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.4% Excellent
Lighting 88.5
Reflection 135
Parallax 168
72% 130 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 92.4
Splatting 131
111% 138 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 93%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 560 226 226 225 226 224 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 2,024
Write 1,350
Mixed 518
SusWrite 281
229% 1,043 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 49.9
190% 71.1 MB/s
DQ Read 984
DQ Write 690
DQ Mixed 574
500% 749 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 193%
Great: 236%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
228GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 350 354 332 318 320 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 370
Write 355
Mixed 344
SusWrite 331
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 32.3
107% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 201
153% 207 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 97%
TONPHA USB 2.0 Classic 16GB
15GB free, PID 0727
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 2.7 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
6.21% Terrible
Read 18.3
Write 10.3
Mixed 18.6
SusWrite 9.3
18% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
24% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.21%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 29.3
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 24.3
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 96.4
42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback