Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics54.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 07 '22 at 17:02
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 82.5
1-Core 135
2-Core 270
89% 163 Pts
4-Core 540
8-Core 872
87% 706 Pts
64-Core 999
62% 999 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Lighting 67.7
Reflection 69.6
Parallax 64.3
55% 67.2 fps
MRender 67.5
Gravity 69.4
Splatting 63.1
54% 66.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$39
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 27 2.9 24 96 50 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 411
Write 300
Mixed 179
SusWrite 65.9
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 19.9
79% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 71.7
DQ Mixed 30.9
40% 71.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 53%
Samsung HD161GJ 160GB-$25
5GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 78 88 82 79 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
41% Average
Read 61.7
Write 60.2
Mixed 51
SusWrite 80.7
47% 63.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41%
Great: 62%
Hitachi HDT725025VLA380 250GB
52GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 42 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.6% Very poor
Read 24.2
Write 41.7
Mixed 26
SusWrite 43
48% 33.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
84.8% Excellent
MC Read 34.7
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 33.1
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 31.5
74% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II Builds (Compare 1,587 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $380
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback