TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Apple MacBookPro16,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics36.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemApple MacBookPro16,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-E1008331FDC96864
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3072 x 1920 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220424
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 06 '22 at 21:37
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9880H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 92
1-Core 116
2-Core 236
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 720
72% 586 Pts
64-Core 971
60% 971 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑
This bench: 88%
 Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
Apple(106B 020F) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.45.40.15
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.5% Below average
Lighting 48.7
Reflection 49.9
Parallax 59.4
40% 52.7 fps
MRender 35.8
Gravity 44
Splatting 32.7
30% 37.5 fps
Poor: 36% ↑
This bench: 36.5%
 Great: 41%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP1024 1TB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1270
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1479
Write 1,610
Mixed 1,224
321% 1,438 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 29.3
110% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,022
DQ Write 455
DQ Mixed 458
414% 645 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 30%
WDC WD50 00AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
369GB free, PID 0216
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 22 24 23 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 22.4
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 22.9
33% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑
This bench: 12.6%
 Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.9% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 21.8
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 21.2
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 71.9%
 Great: 84%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MacBookPro16,1 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Apple MacBookPro16,1

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples33x
Core i9-9880HIntelBench 79%, 11,095 samples29x
Core i9-9980HKIntelBench 82%, 8,965 samples13x
GPU
Radeon Pro 5500MAMDBench 39%, 2,080 samples25x
Radeon Pro 5300MAMDBench 34%, 1,013 samples24x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia  $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples5x
SSD
Portable SSD T5 1TBSamsungBench 77%, 13,039 samples12x
ASM1153E 500GBInateckBench 63%, 102 samples3x
Portable SSD T5 2TBSamsungBench 75%, 2,362 samples3x
RAM
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 2x8GBMicronBench 76%, 20,226 samples30x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 28,425 samples20x
MT40A2G8NEA-062E:J 2x16GBMicronBench 85%, 515 samples15x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback