Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '22 at 22:03
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 75.6
1-Core 143
2-Core 281
89% 166 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 882
86% 704 Pts
64-Core 1,094
68% 1,094 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 92%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NE-256 256GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC0S036F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1495 1529 1232 165 165 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 1979
Write 1,522
Mixed 1,148
SusWrite 784
303% 1,358 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 63.3
220% 80.1 MB/s
DQ Read 708
DQ Write 1,070
DQ Mixed 797
629% 858 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 235%
Great: 234%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$183
8.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 237 237 238 239 238 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 113%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
465GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 131 132 128 133 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 99.9
Write 111
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 117
72% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 77%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
466GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 124 124 124 126 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 106
Write 109
Mixed 65.3
SusWrite 124
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PJ16TFK1GM8 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
52.3% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 17.2
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 19.2
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,687 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $651
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $251WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback