Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 138%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics168% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory47.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210311
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 02 '22 at 19:42
Run Duration286 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 68.2
1-Core 141
2-Core 278
86% 162 Pts
4-Core 528
8-Core 989
90% 758 Pts
64-Core 2,050
127% 2,050 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,135
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
168% Outstanding
Lighting 233
Reflection 234
Parallax 232
190% 233 fps
MRender 232
Gravity 232
Splatting 182
173% 216 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 168%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS500G3XHC-00SJG0 500GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 689 420 365 374 368 357 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1,406
Write 1264
Mixed 1247
SusWrite 429
243% 1,086 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 62.4
216% 79.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,259
DQ Write 992
DQ Mixed 1,084
823% 1,112 MB/s
Poor: 184%
This bench: 199%
Great: 288%
WDS200T3XHC-00SJG0 2TB
172GB free
Firmware: 102430WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2079 1655 990 1002 849 797 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 1749
Write 2,132
Mixed 1,638
SusWrite 1,229
380% 1,687 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 50.9
191% 75.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,279
DQ Write 1,044
DQ Mixed 1,146
862% 1,156 MB/s
Poor: 191%
This bench: 255%
Great: 306%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
654GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 111 111 111 112 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 162
Write 162
Mixed 94.9
SusWrite 110
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 101%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$57
696GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 158 157 159 160 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 154
Write 151
Mixed 96.9
SusWrite 158
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 CMW32GX4M2Z3200C16 CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 CMW32GX4M2Z3200C16 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
67.3% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 24.2
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 21.7
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,904 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $714
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback