Asus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161118
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateAug 01 '22 at 00:56
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 89.9
1-Core 61.2
2-Core 123
58% 91.3 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 346
33% 272 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.8% Poor
Lighting 36.2
Reflection 40.1
Parallax 37.8
30% 38 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 38.4
Splatting 27
27% 34.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 240GB
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 78 79 80 81 80 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.2% Poor
Read 196
Write 5
Mixed 10.8
SusWrite 73.5
15% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 3.9
31% 7.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 90%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
193GB free
Firmware: 2AR20002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 79 81 81 81 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 78.2
Write 43
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 75.1
45% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
175GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 85 84 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 71.1
Write 60.3
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 82.8
48% 65 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 59%
VendorCo ProductCode 64GB
57GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 8.2 11 9.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
7.84% Terrible
Read 30.7
Write 24
Mixed 6
SusWrite 10.8
22% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.6
71% 2 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.84%
Great: 23%
Generic Flash-Disk 4GB
1GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
4.32% Terrible
Read 7.7
Write 1.5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 1.6
4% 3.33 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
72% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.32%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 17.7
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 12.4
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,275 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback