bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Memory6.86GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6.86GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemParallels Parallels ARM Virtual Machine
MotherboardParallels Parallels ARM Virtual Platform
Memory3.5 GB free of 6.85938 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3360 x 2100 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 31 '22 at 02:29
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Apple Silicon
CPU, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Memory 8.38
1-Core 20.2
2-Core 47.9
13% 25.5 Pts
4-Core 71.5
8-Core 78.1
10% 74.8 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 43%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Harddisk SSD 275GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: F.KECGGW
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 147 174 136 215 169 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 38% Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x6GB
1 of 1 slots used
6GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
48.6% Average
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 13.9
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 0.4
4% 1.47 GB/s
Latency 419
10% 419 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 201%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback