Gigabyte GA-945GCM-S2C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive44.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-945GCM-S2C  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100901
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 18 '17 at 05:46
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5700-$22
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
40.7% Average
Memory 68.6
1-Core 38.7
2-Core 74.9
40% 60.7 Pts
4-Core 77
8-Core 75.5
10% 76.2 Pts
64-Core 76.9
5% 76.9 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.5% Average
Read 195
Write 138
Mixed 151
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 29.7
4K Mixed 16
84% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 71.9
DQ Write 84
DQ Mixed 34.6
38% 63.5 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
276GB free
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 108
Write 103
Mixed 126
85% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 1.69
4K Mixed 0.17
85% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 112%
SAMSUNG HD502HJ 500GB
206GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.4% Above average
Read 127
Write 136
Mixed 109
159% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 3.03
4K Mixed 0.46
121% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.1
12% 4.3 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-945GCM-S2C Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-945GCM-S2C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $64
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback