Today's hottest deals

Asrock X570 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X570 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 29 '22 at 00:24
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 69.9
1-Core 133
2-Core 243
81% 149 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 715
68% 560 Pts
64-Core 888
55% 888 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.13023.4001
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.8% Above average
Lighting 66.9
Reflection 63.4
Parallax 91.7
54% 74 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 73
Splatting 47.5
49% 62 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 164 158 159 159 157 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 441
Mixed 419
SusWrite 187
86% 386 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 48.4
159% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 202
152% 204 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 128%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
79GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 158 158 155 157 160 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 122
Write 114
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 158
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$75
889GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 131 123 130 134 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 51.5
Write 59.9
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 127
54% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
55% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$75
973GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 120 117 122 123 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 83.2
Write 101
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 116
68% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
65% Good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 26.8
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 23.1
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Pro4 Builds (Compare 882 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $571
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback