Today's hottest deals

Oegstone DH55TC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive9.91% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemOegstone DH55TC  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DH55TC
Memory5.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111206
Uptime229.8 Days
Run DateJul 25 '22 at 18:31
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$200
XU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 86.3
1-Core 83.1
2-Core 153
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 333
30% 254 Pts
64-Core 309
19% 309 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 85F5) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Lighting 18.5
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 21.1
15% 19.4 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 19.3
Splatting 0.1
8% 11.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 49 4.3 5 12 1.5 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
9.91% Terrible
Read 57.8
Write 55.9
Mixed 45
SusWrite 21.3
10% 45 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 8.3
4K Mixed 5.1
19% 6.23 MB/s
DQ Read 8.5
DQ Write 12.4
DQ Mixed 9.7
8% 10.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 9.91%
Great: 85%
Hua722020ala330 45W6276 59Y1813IBM 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: JKAOA34H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 62 12 18 31 6.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 100
Write 112
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 37.5
55% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173BH0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.1% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 6.1
19% 6.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 6.3
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DH55TC Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Oegstone DH55TC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback