Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics33.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 25 '22 at 05:54
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700KF-$225
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 89.7
1-Core 177
2-Core 349
110% 205 Pts
4-Core 671
8-Core 1,082
108% 876 Pts
64-Core 1,671
103% 1,671 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 107%
Great: 109%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3205) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.3% Below average
Lighting 42.5
Reflection 45.6
Parallax 40.5
35% 42.9 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 40.4
Splatting 35.5
31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MB2000GCWDA 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPGD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 155 163 162 162 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 158
Mixed 90.2
SusWrite 160
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 105%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 6.9 6.9 8.2 8.7 7.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
7.76% Terrible
Read 18.6
Write 2.7
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 7.7
7% 8.93 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
111% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.76%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
86% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 26.9
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 27.6
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 86%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 10,960 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $836
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback