HP 500-208a

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory22GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 22GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP 500-208a  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory16.1 GB free of 22 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140415
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateOct 17 '17 at 03:00
Run Duration452 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 77%
CPU Throttled 91%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6500 APU-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
32.2% Below average
Memory 45.5
1-Core 48.4
2-Core 72.4
34% 55.4 Pts
4-Core 112
8-Core 106
15% 109 Pts
64-Core 89
6% 89 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8570D
HP(103C 2AE0) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
2.77% Terrible
Lighting 2.93
Reflection 4.35
Parallax 4.41
2% 3.9 fps
MRender 2.76
Gravity 4.03
Splatting 5.43
4% 4.08 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.77%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
293GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 84.7
Write 69.4
Mixed 81.7
59% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 0.61
4K Mixed 0.3
60% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$60
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP36 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 115
Write 108
Mixed 98.6
81% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 0.82
4K Mixed 0.1
40% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 113%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
74GB free
Firmware: GG2OAH10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
49% Average
Read 91.2
Write 79.7
Mixed 77.6
62% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 0.41
4K Mixed 0.16
46% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 49%
Great: 58%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
4GB free
Firmware: 2BE10001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 69.9
Write 61.2
Mixed 82.6
54% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 0.53
4K Mixed 0.28
54% 0.38 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 70%
WD 413AS External 500GB
85GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.5% Very poor
Read 32.6
Write 34.5
Mixed 12.6
32% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.28
68% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 21%
TOSHIBA USB DRV 4GB
2GB free, PID 1400, Toshiba 4gb usb 2
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
5.71% Terrible
Read 22.7
Write 4.87
Mixed 4.84
10% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0.006
4K Mixed 0.009
22% 1.91 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.71%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 HU524303EP0200 Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 22GB
1600, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.3% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 4.7
12% 4.3 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 5
12% 4.13 GB/s
Latency 178
22% 178 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-208a Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP 500-208a

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $135
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback