Wortmann_ag 1001273;2120119

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics56.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemWortmann_ag 1001273;2120119  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte Z370M D3H-CF
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '22 at 15:22
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 89.3
1-Core 133
2-Core 261
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 840
82% 670 Pts
64-Core 1,094
68% 1,094 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.9% Above average
Lighting 71.1
Reflection 73.8
Parallax 67.5
58% 70.8 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 69
Splatting 65.6
55% 67 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKKW240H6 240GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSF036C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 117 105 110 106 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 385
Mixed 371
SusWrite 128
76% 342 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 46.4
162% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 238
192% 271 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 204 205 206 205 205 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 137
Mixed 81.9
SusWrite 202
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 106%
Great: 114%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 128GB
88GB free, PID 0727
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 17.9
Write 19.4
Mixed 18
SusWrite 19.7
26% 18.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 4.4
303% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 20%
Terra USThree PRO 32GB
27GB free, PID 5200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 162
Write 86.4
Mixed 79.7
125% 109 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.4
94% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2Z3200C16 Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 029E CMK16GX4M2Z3200C16 Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
79.9% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 24.2
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 23.8
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1001273;2120119 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

System: Wortmann_ag 1001273;2120119

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $303
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback