Asus N552VX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus N552VX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N552VX
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160831
Uptime8.1 Days
Run DateJul 23 '22 at 06:13
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 97
2-Core 184
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 523
54% 432 Pts
64-Core 505
31% 505 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$54
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42B2S7JA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 809 479 480 397 480 408 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 2,432
Write 1,512
Mixed 1,257
SusWrite 508
316% 1,427 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 73.5
246% 84.9 MB/s
DQ Read 934
DQ Write 484
DQ Mixed 588
469% 669 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 236%
Great: 311%
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
408GB free
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 428 434 421 447 433 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 452
Write 391
Mixed 372
SusWrite 433
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 43.9
134% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 319
241% 324 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 101%
Great: 133%
WD Elements 2621 1TB
161GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 117 119 118 115 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 81.3
Write 76.8
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 115
113% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
159% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 66%
SanDisk 3.2 Gen1 64GB
60GB free, PID 55b1, SanDisk Ultra Extreme Go 64GB
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 97 98 98 98 98 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
66% Good
Read 291
Write 93.7
Mixed 48.4
SusWrite 93.4
143% 132 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.8
105% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 66%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
74.9% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 22.4
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 22.4
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N552VX Builds (Compare 374 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N552VX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback