Asus ProArt StudioBook H7600HM_H7600HM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive209% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus ProArt StudioBook H7600HM_H7600HM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK H7600HM
Memory49.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2400 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 22 '22 at 22:18
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 54.2
1-Core 142
2-Core 279
82% 158 Pts
4-Core 529
8-Core 872
86% 700 Pts
64-Core 896
56% 896 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1BC2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1994
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
6% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 101
Parallax 7.5
5% 38.4 fps
MRender 9.4
Gravity 9.6
Splatting 7.8
7% 8.93 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6%
Great: 9%
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 1BC2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.2% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 113
Parallax 98.2
84% 105 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 82.8
Splatting 75.7
73% 91.1 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDS200T1X0E-00AFY0 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 614900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1042 1248 1265 888 1133 1140 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 1,658
Write 1,250
Mixed 1,297
SusWrite 1,119
298% 1,331 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 95
4K Mixed 55.3
184% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 458
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 698
438% 493 MB/s
Poor: 217%
This bench: 209%
Great: 664%
Nvme Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP4000GM30013 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: SU6SM003 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1598 1596 1582 1638 1622 1649 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 1,726
Write 1,565
Mixed 1,556
SusWrite 1,614
364% 1,615 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 71.8
233% 84.2 MB/s
DQ Read 442
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 450
324% 418 MB/s
Poor: 258%
This bench: 258%
Great: 576%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3200C20S4/32GX KF3200C20S4/32GX 63GB
3200, 3200 MHz
32767, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.3% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 21.2
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 10.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProArt StudioBook H7600HM_H7600HM Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus ProArt StudioBook H7600HM_H7600HM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback