MSI A320M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39)

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 20 months ago, 19 months ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7A39
Motherboard	MSI A320M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39) (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190122
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 21 '22 at 05:07
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X-$131 70,038 User benchmarks, average bench 66% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Memory 79.3 1-Core 112 2-Core 225 77% 139 Pts	4-Core 416 8-Core 592 63% 504 Pts	64-Core 594 37% 594 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.96 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.1% Poor	Lighting 36.6 Reflection 41.2 Parallax 38.3 30% 38.7 fps	MRender 38.5 Gravity 38.3 Splatting 27.3 28% 34.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 18 26 20 17 29 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.2% Poor	Read 128 Write 95.7 Mixed 84.5 SusWrite 36.8 19% 86.3 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 19.8 4K Mixed 11 47% 15.2 MB/s	DQ Read 14.4 DQ Write 15.6 DQ Mixed 14.6 11% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 100%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 24GB free Firmware: SBFKJ4.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 468 463 337 36 41 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	93.6% Outstanding	Read 415 Write 391 Mixed 394 SusWrite 301 84% 375 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 83.1 4K Mixed 41.2 148% 52.6 MB/s	DQ Read 238 DQ Write 351 DQ Mixed 197 176% 262 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 93.6% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3600 C20 Series 2x8GB 778 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3600 MHz clocked @ 1800 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	MC Read 49 MC Write 45.5 MC Mixed 37.2 125% 43.9 GB/s	SC Read 25.3 SC Write 42.8 SC Mixed 30.6 94% 32.9 GB/s	Latency 81.8 49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39) Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39)

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	38x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	29x
Ryzen 5 1500XAMD $131Bench 66%, 70,038 samples	27x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	22x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	19x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $33Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	6x
A400 120GBKingston $27Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	5x

RAM
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	8x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 104% - Outstanding

Total price: $233

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16