Today's hottest deals

HP 250 G4 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP 250 G4 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80C2
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151019
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 16 '22 at 22:12
Run Duration395 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Memory 77.8
1-Core 47.5
2-Core 86.8
46% 70.7 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 142
19% 140 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
284GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA0OA7G0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 32 49 61 70 71 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 13.7
Write 32.1
SusWrite 57.5
25% 34.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.2
56% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 57%
SanDisk Ultra 123GB
86GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 15 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
9.3% Terrible
Read 27.1
Write 17.4
Mixed 14
SusWrite 16.2
24% 18.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.9
52% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.3%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BF160B.C16F Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
44.9% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 12.1
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 250 G4 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 250 G4 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback