Today's hottest deals

Asrock B250M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock B250M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170511
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 15 '22 at 05:41
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$83
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 82.8
1-Core 113
2-Core 226
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 450
60% 449 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Nvidia(10DE 11C0) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.2% Poor
Lighting 33
Reflection 34.8
Parallax 33.2
27% 33.7 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 33.4
Splatting 23.2
25% 31.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Klevv NEO N400 SSD 120GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMBB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 351 293 161 115 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 400
Write 384
Mixed 336
SusWrite 241
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 77.8
4K Mixed 37.1
139% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 183
160% 237 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 85%
WD Purple Surveillance 1TB (2017)-$53
858GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 149 148 149 147 147 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 119
Mixed 88.3
SusWrite 147
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 89%
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB
116GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 63 63 64 64 64 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 103%
SanDisk' Cruzer Fit 64GB
59GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 12 9.8 9.4 13 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
7.02% Terrible
Read 22.2
Write 20
Mixed 10
SusWrite 10.4
20% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
32% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.02%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
41% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 10.8
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B250M-HDV Builds (Compare 1,430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock B250M-HDV - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $254
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback