Asus PRIME B250M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive28.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B250M-A  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 14 '22 at 09:38
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 98.9
2-Core 158
71% 116 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 248
34% 252 Pts
64-Core 251
16% 251 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gigabyte(1458 376D) 2GB
CLim: 1151 MHz, MLim: 1427 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.47
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.57% Terrible
Lighting 10.5
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 11.7
9% 11.1 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 9.4
Splatting 9.9
9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.57%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NT-128 128GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T180910
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 28 37 37 25 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.3% Poor
Read 276
Write 35
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 33.3
22% 102 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 18.9
4K Mixed 12.5
40% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 85.1
DQ Write 33.3
DQ Mixed 57.4
43% 58.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 92%
EAGET F50 16GB
14GB free, PID 0917
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 8.4 8.5 7.4 8.5 8.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.4% Terrible
Read 33.9
Write 8.2
Mixed 6
SusWrite 8.3
15% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
33% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.4%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown VMA45UG-MEC1U2AW2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.9% Very good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 23.9
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 20.3
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B250M-A Builds (Compare 4,613 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B250M-A - $74

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $288
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback