Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-cb1xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-cb1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8748
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '22 at 21:56
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 67.5
2-Core 133
56% 92.9 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 429
41% 337 Pts
64-Core 563
35% 563 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super Mobile)
HP(103C 8748) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 153
Reflection 235
Parallax 163
124% 183 fps
Gravity 136
Splatting 126
116% 131 fps
Poor: 98% Great: 128%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00-1006 1TB
728GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10112006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1397 1360 1386 1373 1358 1357 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1,800
Write 1,669
Mixed 1,566
SusWrite 1,372
360% 1,602 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 66.9
4K Mixed 43.7
142% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 609
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 507
367% 482 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 221%
Great: 303%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-3G2J1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.7% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 28
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 18.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 17-cb1xxx Builds (Compare 1,374 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-cb1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback