Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu ESPRIMO E720

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO E720  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3221-A1
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150709
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 11 '22 at 10:14
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User BIH-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 94
2-Core 148
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 365
43% 333 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Lighting 17.1
Reflection 21.4
Parallax 15.5
14% 18 fps
MRender 15
Gravity 16.9
Splatting 0.2
8% 10.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$19
221GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 71 42 33 36 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 75
Write 77.3
Mixed 54.4
SusWrite 48.3
47% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.3
88% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U6EFR8C-PB HMT325U6CFR8C-PB HMT325U6EFR8C-PB HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.3% Average
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 18.2
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 15.6
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO E720 Builds (Compare 310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO E720

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback